Images d'Épinal : Cendrillon |
I have this friend, she is related to EVERYONE. No, seriously she has a cousin connection to
over half of the people we know in common; maybe even more than that. She is also the reason I am sitting here
today and the first person I go to with genealogy questions. Dare I say she is
my genealogy fairy godmother? Perhaps
not, I don’t want to get hit the next time I see her.
What fascinates me about this is the fact that when you
have links to colonial New England, like we do, you have links to a lot of
other people. I have one line from the
Mayflower, Alden, but unlike most persons of that time my family left the area very
quickly. Within 3 generations they were
in New Jersey. A generation later they
were in Kentucky. The next they were in Indiana where my line finally stayed for
the next 150+ years. My other New
England family was named Kelley. They were Irish immigrants to the Boston area
who then moved to Martha’s Vineyard before landing in Indiana via Ohio.
I think it is due to this migration pattern that I have
fewer links to others with colonial roots.
My friend on the other hand has a multitude of connections to a lot of
families because even though her family group moved through New England they
married in every town and integrated into the various communities. Essentialy her family stayed longer and made
more connections. Interesting study in family
dynamics and migration patterns, yes?
She and I have 2 confirmed great X-grandparents in common. They are Christopher Webb and his wife
Humility Cooper (or could it be Wheaton), as well as John Crabtree and his wife
Alice Courtney. We are still looking at
the links to my husband, but so far it seems they may have as many as 7 cousin
connections. My mother-in-law has long
roots in New England, much to her amazement, so this is not as surprising of a
find.
Then there are the connections to figures that are larger
than life. My oldest child, the American
History buff, has grabbed onto the fact that we are cousins to Presidents on
one side and a signer of the Declaration on Independence on the other, all because
we have the same colonial genealogical roots.
These cousin connections have sent my son on a research spree (you
should have seen him when he was shown his cousins signature on the declaration
at the archives). He comes to me every
so often to let me know about another cousin connection he found on the
internet. The hard part? Trying to explain how distant of a connection
this is. To him a cousin is a cousin
darn it, we should be proud of all our ancestors. It must be that need in people to be connected
in some way to people or places that have a historical significance.
What are your thoughts?
Do you have lots of cousin connections to fellow
genealogy friends?
Did your family stay for longer periods of time, or did
they have itchy feet?
I’d love to hear your experiences with researching New England
ancestors and families that cross (sometimes more than once) with each other.
Just remember to be home by midnight, or the coach turns back into a pumpkin .... :)
ReplyDeleteSeriously, Thank you.
As to the rest, I find I am more pleased with the cousin connections I have made with my friends and co-workers than with the famous (or infamous) now. Frankly, most people are connected to someone famous somehow -- they just might not know it. I grew up knowing that I had tons of Rev War ancestors, as well as Colonial Founders and royalty. While that got me started on a history bent, it became routine and common to add yet another patriot or noble to the ranks. But finding out the friends that I made along the way are cousins -- that is priceless to me now.
It is nice to know that you are related to some of your closest friends. We can travel crazy genealogy roads together! And... you are welcome. :)
DeleteYes, I think virtually everyone wants to have some famous connection, and that's an especially good way to get kids interested in genealogy. That's great!
ReplyDeleteMy other thought is that -- especially from reading Heather Rojo's blogs -- I have the impression that everyone from early New England is somehow related to everyone else from early New England. Even if your connections to NE are distant ones, they are probably themselves related to everyone else in the area!
The more I research the more I find that this is true!
DeleteI am glad for the thought. My family stayed in New England since they came in the early 1600's. I never thought about the cousin connection before. My friend who got me hooked on the internet and genealogy is descended from William Brewster and so am I. That makes us some sort of cousin I guess. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteYes! Distant cousins, but still cousins. Like my friend and I who are 8th cousins 2x removed or something. It is nice to have people to share your experiences with who really appreciates what you find too. As well as people who then can help you with research and historical context of the area.
Delete